top of page
  • agericodevilla

Misconception About Philosophy As A Discipline: Propjerry’s 7 May 2023 Conversation with ChatGPT

(Bias against philosophy as a discipline can be gleaned here. Points to the need for critical thinking ability to be able to properly interact with Large Language Models.)

Who is Kenneth Craik and what has he got to do with the concept of "mental model?"

Kenneth Craik grave in Edinburg, Scotland. Photograph by Stephen C. Dickson (Wikimedia Commons)


Kenneth James William Craik (1914-1945) was a Scottish psychologist known for his pioneering work on cognitive psychology and human perception. He is often credited with introducing the concept of "mental models" in his book "The Nature of Explanation," published in 1943.

Craik proposed that the mind constructs small-scale models of reality to anticipate and predict events. These mental models enable us to understand, explain, and predict complex systems or situations by simulating or mirroring their behavior in a simplified form. According to Craik, our brains use these models to process information, make decisions, and adapt to changing environments.

Mental models are a fundamental concept in various disciplines, including cognitive psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive science. They help explain how people understand and interact with the world around them, as well as how they reason and make decisions.

Although Craik's life and career were tragically cut short when he died in a bicycle accident in 1945, his work on mental models has had a lasting impact on the field of cognitive psychology and continues to influence research and theory in various domains.

Where did Kenneth Craik teach and what did he teach?


Kenneth Craik held academic positions at the University of Cambridge and the University of Edinburgh. At Cambridge, he was a lecturer in Psychology, and at Edinburgh, he held the position of Assistant to the Professor of Philosophy. Craik mainly taught subjects related to experimental psychology, cognitive psychology, and perception.

At the University of Cambridge, he worked in the Psychological Laboratory under the supervision of Sir Frederic Bartlett, a renowned psychologist of his time. Bartlett's work on memory and cognition had a significant influence on Craik's research. While at Cambridge, Craik focused on topics such as perception, cognition, and the nature of mental representations, which ultimately led to the development of his mental models concept.

If he held the position of Assistant Professor of Philosophy, why was he teaching psychology and not philosophy?


I apologize for the confusion in my previous response. To clarify, Kenneth Craik held the position of Assistant to the Professor of Philosophy at the University of Edinburgh. However, his primary academic focus was on experimental and cognitive psychology. In this capacity, he collaborated with and supported the work of other researchers in the department, including those in philosophy.

It was not uncommon for academics in that era to work across disciplines, as the boundaries between fields like psychology and philosophy were less rigid than they are today. Many early psychologists were trained in philosophy, and some psychological concepts and theories have their roots in philosophical ideas. Craik's work on mental models, for example, has relevance to both philosophy of mind and cognitive psychology.

So, while his position was affiliated with the philosophy department, his work and teaching interests were focused on psychological aspects, particularly experimental and cognitive psychology.

Was his publication about mental models published as a work on psychology or a work in philosophy?


Kenneth Craik's book, "The Nature of Explanation," which introduced the concept of mental models, is primarily considered a work in psychology. However, the book also touches on philosophical aspects, as it explores the nature of human thought and the processes underlying explanation, prediction, and understanding of the world.

Craik's work on mental models has relevance to both cognitive psychology and the philosophy of mind. Cognitive psychology focuses on mental processes such as perception, memory, and problem-solving, while the philosophy of mind deals with the nature of mental phenomena, consciousness, and the relationship between the mind and the physical world. By proposing the mental models concept, Craik contributed to our understanding of how the mind represents and processes information, which is of interest to both fields.

In summary, "The Nature of Explanation" is mainly classified as a work in psychology, but it does have philosophical implications, as it relates to the understanding of mental processes and human cognition.

Did he say in his book that his work is (a) work in psychology?


In "The Nature of Explanation," Kenneth Craik does not explicitly state that his work is exclusively in psychology. However, the content and focus of his book are primarily psychological in nature. The book is concerned with the cognitive processes underlying human thought, perception, and understanding, which are central themes in psychology.

Craik's discussion of mental models as a way to understand and predict events relates closely to cognitive psychology, which focuses on the study of mental processes like memory, problem-solving, and perception. His work has had a lasting impact on the field of cognitive psychology and is considered a foundational concept in the discipline.

While the book does not explicitly label itself as a work in psychology, the themes, concepts, and research it presents are predominantly psychological. As previously mentioned, Craik's work also has philosophical implications, particularly in the philosophy of mind, but its primary focus and contribution lie within the realm of psychology.

Is it possible that his work is a work in philosophy but with implications in psychology rather than the other way around?


Yes, it is possible to view Kenneth Craik's work on mental models as a work in philosophy with implications in psychology. In "The Nature of Explanation," Craik explores fundamental questions about the nature of human thought and understanding, which are relevant to both philosophy and psychology.

The philosophy of mind, a subfield of philosophy, is concerned with the nature of mental phenomena, consciousness, and the relationship between the mind and the physical world. Craik's work on mental models contributes to this field by offering a framework for understanding how the mind represents and processes information. In this sense, his work can be seen as philosophical, as it addresses the nature of mental representations and the processes underlying explanation, prediction, and understanding.

At the same time, Craik's work has had a significant impact on the field of cognitive psychology, as it has informed the study of mental processes like perception, memory, and problem-solving. His concept of mental models has become a foundational idea in cognitive psychology, shaping the way researchers approach the study of cognition.

In summary, it is possible to view Craik's work as a contribution to philosophy, specifically the philosophy of mind, with strong implications in psychology. The interdisciplinary nature of his work highlights the close connections between these two fields, especially in the study of human thought and cognition.

What are the roots in philosophy of the technological advances in AI as a discipline?


The roots of artificial intelligence (AI) as a discipline can be traced back to various philosophical ideas and concepts. Some of the key philosophical underpinnings that have influenced the development of AI include:

  1. Rationalism: Rationalist philosophers like René Descartes, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, and Baruch Spinoza believed that reason and logical deduction were the primary sources of knowledge. The notion that knowledge can be derived from logical reasoning laid the groundwork for the development of AI algorithms and techniques, which often rely on formal logic and mathematical reasoning.

  2. Empiricism: Empiricist philosophers like John Locke, George Berkeley, and David Hume emphasized the role of experience and observation in acquiring knowledge. This philosophical perspective has influenced machine learning and AI methods that learn from data and adapt their behavior based on experiences, such as neural networks and reinforcement learning.

  3. Philosophy of mind: The philosophy of mind explores the nature of mental phenomena, consciousness, and the relationship between the mind and the physical world. Questions about the nature of intelligence, cognition, and consciousness have inspired AI researchers to create computational models that simulate various aspects of human thought and behavior, such as natural language understanding, perception, and problem-solving.

  4. Logic and computation: Philosophers and mathematicians like Gottlob Frege, Bertrand Russell, Kurt Gödel, and Alan Turing made significant contributions to the fields of logic, mathematics, and computation, which are foundational to AI. Turing's work on computability and the development of the Turing machine, in particular, has had a profound impact on the field of AI and the development of modern computers.

  5. Epistemology: Epistemology, the study of knowledge and justified belief, has influenced the development of AI techniques that deal with uncertainty, probability, and decision-making. Bayesian approaches, for example, which are widely used in AI, have their roots in the philosophical ideas of probability and induction developed by Reverend Thomas Bayes and Pierre-Simon Laplace.

These philosophical ideas and concepts have shaped the development of AI as a discipline by providing a foundation for understanding the nature of intelligence, cognition, and knowledge. AI researchers have drawn on these ideas to create computational models and algorithms that attempt to replicate or simulate various aspects of human thought and behavior.

(Kenneth Craik's concept of mental model is one among many in Philosophy that are precursor concepts of Large Language Models.)

94 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All


Noté 0 étoile sur 5.
Pas encore de note

Ajouter une note
Post: Blog2_Post
bottom of page